Interviewing the Interpretive Researcher: A Method for Addressing the Crises of Representation, Legitimation, and Praxis

Anthony J. Onwuegbuzie, Nancy L. Leech, Kathleen M.T. Collins

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

61 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In this article the authors outline five types of debriefing and introduce a new type of debriefing, namely, that of debriefing the interpretive researcher. Next they present eight main areas accompanied by example questions to guide the interviewer when debriefing the researcher. They also present five authenticity criteria developed by Guba and Lincoln (1989) and include possible interview questions to document the degree to which the researcher has met these criteria. Finally, using Miles and Huberman's (1994) framework, they illustrate how displays such as matrices can be used to collect, analyze, and interpret debriefing interview data as well as leave an audit trail.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-17
Number of pages17
JournalThe International Journal of Qualitative Methods
Volume7
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2008
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • authenticity criteria
  • debriefing
  • debriefing the interviewer
  • interviewing
  • researcher bias

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Education

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Interviewing the Interpretive Researcher: A Method for Addressing the Crises of Representation, Legitimation, and Praxis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this