TY - GEN
T1 - Integrating Geostatistical Models and Machine Learning for Infill Well Placement and Production Forecasting in Mature Field
AU - Kumar, A.
AU - Golghanddashti, H.
AU - Selvaraj, D.
AU - Kumar, R.
AU - Verma, A.
AU - Senapati, S.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 EAGE. All Rights Reserved.
PY - 2024
Y1 - 2024
N2 - Optimizing infill well placement in mature oil fields is complex due to reservoir dynamic complexity and extensive production history. ombining geostatistical models with machine learning workflows yields quick and effective results. Geostatistical models capture geological and petrophysical properties, while machine learning analyzes and predicts time-dependent variables. The production model involves history matching and forecasting using a workflow that includes initial production estimation, reservoir pressure prediction, generating missing data, predicting production rates, and model validation. The primary algorithm used is Random Forest. The saturation model employs XGBoost for modeling lateral-vertical saturation movement and creating a 3D saturation model. This model predicts saturation distribution during history and forecasts future saturation distribution. The infill location model identifies potential infill well locations and perforation intervals, and forecasts production potential. It uses well filtering, clustering analysis, and pressure estimation to optimize production efficiency.. The integrated approach successfully identifies multiple infill locations without simulation, providing better results than data-driven models alone. Validation of results after each model run and scrutiny of suggested locations are crucial for forecasting production profiles.
AB - Optimizing infill well placement in mature oil fields is complex due to reservoir dynamic complexity and extensive production history. ombining geostatistical models with machine learning workflows yields quick and effective results. Geostatistical models capture geological and petrophysical properties, while machine learning analyzes and predicts time-dependent variables. The production model involves history matching and forecasting using a workflow that includes initial production estimation, reservoir pressure prediction, generating missing data, predicting production rates, and model validation. The primary algorithm used is Random Forest. The saturation model employs XGBoost for modeling lateral-vertical saturation movement and creating a 3D saturation model. This model predicts saturation distribution during history and forecasts future saturation distribution. The infill location model identifies potential infill well locations and perforation intervals, and forecasts production potential. It uses well filtering, clustering analysis, and pressure estimation to optimize production efficiency.. The integrated approach successfully identifies multiple infill locations without simulation, providing better results than data-driven models alone. Validation of results after each model run and scrutiny of suggested locations are crucial for forecasting production profiles.
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105016199116
U2 - 10.3997/2214-4609.202477016
DO - 10.3997/2214-4609.202477016
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:105016199116
T3 - EAGE Conference on Energy Excellence: Digital Twins and Predictive Analytics
BT - EAGE Conference on Energy Excellence
PB - EAGE Publications BV
T2 - EAGE Conference on Energy Excellence: Digital Twins and Predictive Analytics 2024
Y2 - 15 October 2024 through 16 October 2024
ER -