Inequalities and content moderation

Giovanni De Gregorio, Nicole Stremlau

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

As the harms of hate speech, mis/disinformation and incitement to violence on social media have become increasingly apparent, calls for regulation have accelerated. Most of these debates have centred around the needs and concerns of large markets such as the EU and the United States, or the aggressive approach countries such as Russia and China adopt to regulate online content. Our focus in this article is with the rest, the smaller markets at the periphery of the advertising industry, and the deep inequalities that current approaches to content moderation perpetuate. We outline the depth of the unequal practice of moderation, particularly across Africa, and explore the underlying political and economic factors driving this gap. While recognizing content moderation has many limitations, we conclude by underlining potential approaches to increase oversight in content moderation.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)870-879
Number of pages10
JournalGlobal Policy
Volume14
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Nov 2023

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Global and Planetary Change
  • Economics and Econometrics
  • Political Science and International Relations
  • Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law
  • Law

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Inequalities and content moderation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this