Abstract
Public health measures for medical emergencies generate methodological and ethical challenges for human research. Using Emanuel et al.'s framework, we assessed the ethical integrity of the research methods used in a men's alcohol and other drug (AOD) use disorder study following their revision due to COVID-19 restrictions in South Africa. Following the amendments, the study's social value, favorable risk-benefit ratio, and respect for participants increased. Collaborative partnership, scientific validity, fair participant selection, independent review, and informed consent improved in terms of successful stakeholder engagements and interviewing procedures, but were compromised due to a cellphone access eligibility criterion and complicated consenting procedures. Methodological and ethical challenges of research during health emergencies can be navigated with flexibility and innovation.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 134-147 |
| Number of pages | 14 |
| Journal | Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics |
| Volume | 21 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Jul 2026 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
-
SDG 12 Responsible Consumption and Production
-
SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
Keywords
- COVID-19
- Emanuelet al.ethical principles
- alcohol and other drug use research
- collaborative partnerships
- ethical principles
- flexibility
- health emergencies
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Social Psychology
- Education
- Communication
- Law
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Implications of COVID-19 Restrictions on the Ethics and Methods of a Multi-Site Study on Alcohol and Other Drug (AOD) Use Treatment among Men in South Africa'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Press/Media
Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver