TY - GEN
T1 - Impact of feature selection on sEMG signal classification
AU - Jena, Ashutosh
AU - Baberwal, Krishna
AU - Gehlot, Naveen
AU - Kumar, Rajesh
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 IEEE.
PY - 2023
Y1 - 2023
N2 - The sEMG signal contains both relevant and irrelevant features. In order to reduce the computational burden, time, and cost of hardware development, only the selection of relevant features is necessary. This research article reports an impact analysis of feature selection on hand gesture classification based on surface electromyography (sEMG) signals. For this purpose, the analysis of variance (ANOVA) algorithm is used to rank the features. A subject selection method is developed on the basis of ranked features, to select a generalized subject. Four classifiers, including Decision Tree (DT), Support Vector Machine (SVM), k-Nearest Neighbor (kNN), and Naïve Bayes (NB), have been considered to test the impact of feature selection. The performance of classifiers before and after feature selection is compared on the basis of accuracy, precision, recall, f1-score, training, and testing time. Average accuracy and time consumption improves from 70.04% and 0.13425 seconds to 89.75% and 0.03845 seconds after ANOVA based feature selection is employed. Additionally, four channels are identified to reduce complexity of acquisition device.
AB - The sEMG signal contains both relevant and irrelevant features. In order to reduce the computational burden, time, and cost of hardware development, only the selection of relevant features is necessary. This research article reports an impact analysis of feature selection on hand gesture classification based on surface electromyography (sEMG) signals. For this purpose, the analysis of variance (ANOVA) algorithm is used to rank the features. A subject selection method is developed on the basis of ranked features, to select a generalized subject. Four classifiers, including Decision Tree (DT), Support Vector Machine (SVM), k-Nearest Neighbor (kNN), and Naïve Bayes (NB), have been considered to test the impact of feature selection. The performance of classifiers before and after feature selection is compared on the basis of accuracy, precision, recall, f1-score, training, and testing time. Average accuracy and time consumption improves from 70.04% and 0.13425 seconds to 89.75% and 0.03845 seconds after ANOVA based feature selection is employed. Additionally, four channels are identified to reduce complexity of acquisition device.
KW - ANOVA
KW - Feature Selection
KW - Machine Learning
KW - sEMG Signal
KW - Subject Selection
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85179852054&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1109/ICCCNT56998.2023.10306464
DO - 10.1109/ICCCNT56998.2023.10306464
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:85179852054
T3 - 2023 14th International Conference on Computing Communication and Networking Technologies, ICCCNT 2023
BT - 2023 14th International Conference on Computing Communication and Networking Technologies, ICCCNT 2023
PB - Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.
T2 - 14th International Conference on Computing Communication and Networking Technologies, ICCCNT 2023
Y2 - 6 July 2023 through 8 July 2023
ER -