TY - JOUR
T1 - How to build science-action partnerships for local land-use planning and management
T2 - Lessons from Durban, South Africa
AU - Cockburn, Jessica
AU - Rouget, Mathieu
AU - Slotow, Rob
AU - Roberts, Debra
AU - Boon, Richard
AU - Douwes, Errol
AU - O’donoghue, Sean
AU - Downs, Colleen T.
AU - Mukherjee, Shomen
AU - Musakwa, Walter
AU - Mutanga, Onisimo
AU - Mwabvu, Tarombera
AU - Odindi, John
AU - Odindo, Alfred
AU - Procheş, Şerban
AU - Ramdhani, Syd
AU - Ray-Mukherjee, Jayanti
AU - Sershen,
AU - Schoeman, M. Corrie
AU - Smit, Albertus J.
AU - Wale, Edilegnaw
AU - Willows-Munro, Sandi
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2016 by the author(s).
PY - 2016
Y1 - 2016
N2 - The gap between scientific knowledge and implementation in the fields of biodiversity conservation, environmental management, and climate change adaptation has resulted in many calls from practitioners and academics to provide practical solutions responding effectively to the risks and opportunities of global environmental change, e.g., Future Earth. We present a framework to guide the implementation of science-action partnerships based on a real-world case study of a partnership between a local municipality and an academic institution to bridge the science-action gap in the eThekwini Municipal Area, South Africa. This partnership aims to inform the implementation of sustainable land-use planning, biodiversity conservation, environmental management, and climate change adaptation practice and contributes to the development of human capacity in these areas of expertise. Using a transdisciplinary approach, implementation-driven research is being conducted to develop several decision-making products to better inform land-use planning and management. Lessons learned through this partnership are synthesized and presented as a framework of enabling actions operating at different levels, from the individual to the interorganizational. Enabling actions include putting in place enabling organizational preconditions, assembling a functional well-structured team, and actively building interpersonal and individual collaborative capacity. Lessons learned in the case study emphasize the importance of building collaborative capacity and social capital, and paying attention to the process of transdisciplinary research to achieve more tangible science, management, and policy objectives in science-action partnerships. By documenting and reflecting on the process, this case study provides conceptual and practical guidance on bridging the science-action gap through partnerships.
AB - The gap between scientific knowledge and implementation in the fields of biodiversity conservation, environmental management, and climate change adaptation has resulted in many calls from practitioners and academics to provide practical solutions responding effectively to the risks and opportunities of global environmental change, e.g., Future Earth. We present a framework to guide the implementation of science-action partnerships based on a real-world case study of a partnership between a local municipality and an academic institution to bridge the science-action gap in the eThekwini Municipal Area, South Africa. This partnership aims to inform the implementation of sustainable land-use planning, biodiversity conservation, environmental management, and climate change adaptation practice and contributes to the development of human capacity in these areas of expertise. Using a transdisciplinary approach, implementation-driven research is being conducted to develop several decision-making products to better inform land-use planning and management. Lessons learned through this partnership are synthesized and presented as a framework of enabling actions operating at different levels, from the individual to the interorganizational. Enabling actions include putting in place enabling organizational preconditions, assembling a functional well-structured team, and actively building interpersonal and individual collaborative capacity. Lessons learned in the case study emphasize the importance of building collaborative capacity and social capital, and paying attention to the process of transdisciplinary research to achieve more tangible science, management, and policy objectives in science-action partnerships. By documenting and reflecting on the process, this case study provides conceptual and practical guidance on bridging the science-action gap through partnerships.
KW - Biodiversity conservation
KW - Boundary organization
KW - Climate change adaptation
KW - Collaboration
KW - Environmental management
KW - Sustainable development
KW - Transdisciplinary research
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84962720457&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.5751/ES-08109-210128
DO - 10.5751/ES-08109-210128
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84962720457
SN - 1708-3087
VL - 21
JO - Ecology and Society
JF - Ecology and Society
IS - 1
M1 - 28
ER -