Growing Divides between Establishment and Climate Justice Proponents: A View from the Extremes of South Africa

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

The failure of elites negotiating global public goods - e.g., ending COVID-19 "vaccine apartheid,"forging geopolitical stability, reducing inequality, regulating international financial flows, and avoiding world recession - is nowhere more dangerous than the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change's refusal to cut greenhouse gas emissions deeply and fairly. "Climate Justice"principles are ignored, so divisions grow between what ruling elites consider possible, and what activists demand. This is evident in a South Africa suffering among the world's highest emissions levels, extreme weather events, the worst inequality, and a neoliberal, carbon-addicted corporate power bloc determining most of the policy terrain. But activists are forcefully resisting.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)360-381
Number of pages22
JournalPerspectives on Global Development and Technology
Volume21
Issue number5-6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2023

Keywords

  • Climate justice
  • Just Transition
  • South Africa
  • United Nations
  • extreme weather
  • reparations

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health (social science)
  • Geography, Planning and Development
  • Education
  • Development
  • Social Sciences (miscellaneous)

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Growing Divides between Establishment and Climate Justice Proponents: A View from the Extremes of South Africa'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this