Abstract
We aimed to test the possible differences in gonial angle values between a Medieval sample and a contemporary sample because literature suggests that modern skulls tend to have larger gonial angles. We analyzed the gonial angle values in a Medieval sample (n=69) and a current sample (20th century sample; n=146). We found that current gonial angle values were 3.6º(CI95% 2.2-4.9) larger than the Medieval angle values (p<0.001). No significant differences between the right and left angle values in both the Medieval (p=0.131) and current sample (p=0.120) were observed. The right angle values of the current sample were 3.6ºlarger (CI95% 1.9-5.3) than the medieval right angle values while the left angle values of the current sample were 3.5ºlarger (CI95% 1.9-5.2) than the Medieval left angle values. Our research suggests that the present population have larger angle values than the Medieval population.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 41-48 |
| Number of pages | 8 |
| Journal | European Journal of Anatomy |
| Volume | 25 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| Publication status | Published - 2021 |
Keywords
- Diet
- Mandibular anatomy
- Mandibular injuries
- Risk factors
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Anatomy
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Gonial angle measures in Medieval and contemporary skeletons'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver