First-Line Antituberculosis Drug Challenge Reactions in Drug Reaction With Eosinophilia and Systemic Symptoms Syndrome in an HIV Endemic Setting

  • Mireille Porter
  • , Rhodine Smith
  • , Nadine Teixeira
  • , Bukiwe Thwala
  • , Phuti Choshi
  • , Elizabeth J. Phillips
  • , Graeme Meintjes
  • , Sipho Dlamini
  • , Jonathan Grant Peter
  • , Rannakoe J. Lehloenya

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: In high HIV prevalence settings, first-line antituberculosis drug (FLTD)-associated drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS) poses therapeutic challenges. A sequential and additive drug challenge (SADC) of FLTDs best identifies offending drug(s), avoids unnecessary exclusions, and optimizes reinitiation of nonoffending drugs. However, SADC-associated reaction complexities limit its utility. Objective: We aimed to describe the characteristics of patients with FLTD-associated DRESS, their treatment-limiting SADC reactions, and related outcomes. Methods: Patients hospitalized with FLTD-associated DRESS from 2013 to 2023 in a South African tertiary hospital and enrolled (retrospectively or prospectively) in an existing registry were eligible. Results: SADC was undertaken in 41 patients. Overall, 47 classifiable reactions occurred. 34/47 (72%) reactions in 29/41 (71%) patients were treatment-limiting and 12 of 41(29%) patients reinitiated FLTDs uneventfully. Fifteen single and 8 multiple drug reactors were identified. Rifampicin in 13 of 23(57%) reactors was the most common individual offender. Ethambutol was most frequently involved in multiple drug reactors. The median (interquartile range) time to a detectable reaction was 24(12-120) hours, 6 of 34(18%) being immediate (<6 hours). Itch (65%), eosinophilia (56%), fever (41%), atypical lymphocytosis (41%), rash (38%), transaminitis (32%), and facial edema (18%) singly or in combination were the most common features. Three reactions, 1 epidermal necrolysis and 2 liver derangements, were Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events grade 4 (life-threatening) events. No predictors of multiple drug reactivity were identified, but multiple reactors were hospitalized significantly longer, 125(100-134) days versus 60(45-80) days. Conclusions: SADC optimizes FLTD reinitiation. However, timing, clinical presentation, and severity of SADC-associated reactions after FLTD-associated DRESS are markedly heterogeneous. Additionally, multiple drug reactors are a complex group that require longer hospitalization. There are no routine biomarkers available to distinguish true multiple drug hypersensitivity from nonspecific flare-ups and to guide long-term drug avoidance strategies.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2798-2808.e12
JournalJournal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology: In Practice
Volume12
Issue number10
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Oct 2024
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Drug challenge
  • Drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms syndrome
  • Drug-induced hypersensitivity syndrome
  • First-line antituberculosis drugs
  • HIV
  • Multiple drug hypersensitivity
  • Oral provocation testing
  • Tuberculosis

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Immunology and Allergy

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'First-Line Antituberculosis Drug Challenge Reactions in Drug Reaction With Eosinophilia and Systemic Symptoms Syndrome in an HIV Endemic Setting'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this