First-Line Antituberculosis Drug Challenge Reactions in Drug Reaction With Eosinophilia and Systemic Symptoms Syndrome in an HIV Endemic Setting

Mireille Porter, Rhodine Smith, Nadine Teixeira, Bukiwe Thwala, Phuti Choshi, Elizabeth J. Phillips, Graeme Meintjes, Sipho Dlamini, Jonathan Grant Peter, Rannakoe J. Lehloenya

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: In high HIV prevalence settings, first-line antituberculosis drug (FLTD)-associated drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS) poses therapeutic challenges. A sequential and additive drug challenge (SADC) of FLTDs best identifies offending drug(s), avoids unnecessary exclusions, and optimizes reinitiation of nonoffending drugs. However, SADC-associated reaction complexities limit its utility. Objective: We aimed to describe the characteristics of patients with FLTD-associated DRESS, their treatment-limiting SADC reactions, and related outcomes. Methods: Patients hospitalized with FLTD-associated DRESS from 2013 to 2023 in a South African tertiary hospital and enrolled (retrospectively or prospectively) in an existing registry were eligible. Results: SADC was undertaken in 41 patients. Overall, 47 classifiable reactions occurred. 34/47 (72%) reactions in 29/41 (71%) patients were treatment-limiting and 12 of 41(29%) patients reinitiated FLTDs uneventfully. Fifteen single and 8 multiple drug reactors were identified. Rifampicin in 13 of 23(57%) reactors was the most common individual offender. Ethambutol was most frequently involved in multiple drug reactors. The median (interquartile range) time to a detectable reaction was 24(12-120) hours, 6 of 34(18%) being immediate (<6 hours). Itch (65%), eosinophilia (56%), fever (41%), atypical lymphocytosis (41%), rash (38%), transaminitis (32%), and facial edema (18%) singly or in combination were the most common features. Three reactions, 1 epidermal necrolysis and 2 liver derangements, were Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events grade 4 (life-threatening) events. No predictors of multiple drug reactivity were identified, but multiple reactors were hospitalized significantly longer, 125(100-134) days versus 60(45-80) days. Conclusions: SADC optimizes FLTD reinitiation. However, timing, clinical presentation, and severity of SADC-associated reactions after FLTD-associated DRESS are markedly heterogeneous. Additionally, multiple drug reactors are a complex group that require longer hospitalization. There are no routine biomarkers available to distinguish true multiple drug hypersensitivity from nonspecific flare-ups and to guide long-term drug avoidance strategies.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2798-2808.e12
JournalJournal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology: In Practice
Volume12
Issue number10
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Oct 2024
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Drug challenge
  • Drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms syndrome
  • Drug-induced hypersensitivity syndrome
  • First-line antituberculosis drugs
  • HIV
  • Multiple drug hypersensitivity
  • Oral provocation testing
  • Tuberculosis

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Immunology and Allergy

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'First-Line Antituberculosis Drug Challenge Reactions in Drug Reaction With Eosinophilia and Systemic Symptoms Syndrome in an HIV Endemic Setting'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this