Finite element model updating using fish school search and volitive particle swarm optimization

I. Boulkaibet, L. Mthembu, F. De Lima Neto, T. Marwala

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

39 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

A customized version of Fish School Search (FSS) algorithm and the innovative volitive operator of FSS (which is incorporated into the regular particle swarm optimization (PSO) algorithm) are applied to the finite element model (FEM) updating problem. These algorithms are tested on the updating of two real structures namely; an unsymmetrical H-shaped beam and a GARTEUR SM-AG19 structure. The results thereof are compared with results of two other metaheuristic algorithms: Genetic Algorithm (GA) and Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO) on the same structures. The GA and PSO algorithms being the most popular metaheuristic algorithms used in the model updating area. It is observed that on average, the FSS and PSO algorithms produce more accurate results than the GA. In this paper we confirm that the FSSb (i.e. a customised version of the FSS algorithm, with minor modifications) and the hybrid algorithm - the Volitive PSO (i.e. the volitive operator of FSS into PSO) - are also more effective in this optimization task, producing superior results when updating the underlining Finite Element Model of both structures.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)361-376
Number of pages16
JournalIntegrated Computer-Aided Engineering
Volume22
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 27 Aug 2015

Keywords

  • Finite element model (FEM)
  • Fish school search (FSS)
  • Genetic algorithm (GA)
  • Particle swarm optimization (PSO)
  • Volitive PSO

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Software
  • Theoretical Computer Science
  • Computer Science Applications
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics
  • Artificial Intelligence

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Finite element model updating using fish school search and volitive particle swarm optimization'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this