TY - JOUR
T1 - Examining oral pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) literacy among participants in an HIV vaccine trial preparedness cohort study
AU - On behalf of the PrEPVacc Study Group
AU - Chimukuche, Rujeko Samanthia
AU - Kawuma, Rachel
AU - Mahapa, Nteboheleng
AU - Mkhwanazi, Smanga
AU - Singh, Nishanta
AU - Siva, Samantha
AU - Ruzagira, Eugene
AU - Seeley, Janet
AU - Gray, Glenda
AU - Singh, Nishanta
AU - Gaffoor, Zakir
AU - Morar, Neetha
AU - Sithole, Thandiwe
AU - Woeber, Kubashni
AU - Siva, Samantha
AU - Hwengwere, Eldinah
AU - Chidawanyika, Rujeko Samanthia
AU - Mahapa, Nteboheleng
AU - Khanyile, Phindile
AU - Jani, Ilesh
AU - Viegas, Edna
AU - Remane, Isabel
AU - Bule, Odete
AU - Nhacule, Edna
AU - Ramgi, Patricia
AU - Chissumba, Raquel
AU - Namalango, Eduardo
AU - Manganhe, Yolanda
AU - Massingue, Carmelia
AU - Capitine, Igor
AU - Ribeiro, Jorge
AU - Maganga, Lucas
AU - William, Wiston
AU - Kapesa, Emmanuel
AU - Danstan, Elizabeth
AU - Pamba, Doreen
AU - Kway, Marco Missanga Amani
AU - Kisinda, Abisai
AU - Njovu, Lilian
AU - Sudi, Lwitiho
AU - Kunambi, Revocatus
AU - Aboud, Said
AU - Munseri, Patricia
AU - Lyamuya, Eligius
AU - Msafiri, Frank
AU - Joachim, Agricola
AU - Tarimo, Edith
AU - Nagu, Diana Faini Tumaini
AU - Buma, Deus
AU - Bakari, Muhammad
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2022, The Author(s).
PY - 2022/12
Y1 - 2022/12
N2 - Background: PrEP literacy is influenced by many factors including the types of information available and how it is interpreted. The level of PrEP literacy may influence acceptability and uptake. Methods: We conducted 25 in-depth interviews in a HIV vaccine trial preparedness cohort study. We explored what participants knew about PrEP, sources of PrEP knowledge and how much they know about PrEP. We used the framework approach to generate themes for analysis guided by the Social Ecological Model and examined levels of PrEP literacy using the individual and interpersonal constructs of the SEM. Results: We found that PrEP awareness is strongly influenced by external factors such as social media and how much participants know about HIV treatment and prevention in the local community. However, while participants highlighted the importance of the internet/social media as a source of information about PrEP they talked of low PrEP literacy in their communities. Participants indicated that their own knowledge came as a result of joining the HIV vaccine trial preparedness study. However, some expressed doubts about the effectiveness of the drug and worried about side effects. Participants commented that at the community level PrEP was associated with being sexually active, because it was used to prevent the sexual transmission of HIV. As a result, some participants commented that one could feel judged by the health workers for asking for PrEP at health facilities in the community. Conclusion: The information collected in this study provided an understanding of the different layers of influence around individuals that are important to address to improve PrEP acceptability and uptake. Our findings can inform strategies to address the barriers to PrEP uptake, particularly at structural and community levels. Trial registration: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04066881.
AB - Background: PrEP literacy is influenced by many factors including the types of information available and how it is interpreted. The level of PrEP literacy may influence acceptability and uptake. Methods: We conducted 25 in-depth interviews in a HIV vaccine trial preparedness cohort study. We explored what participants knew about PrEP, sources of PrEP knowledge and how much they know about PrEP. We used the framework approach to generate themes for analysis guided by the Social Ecological Model and examined levels of PrEP literacy using the individual and interpersonal constructs of the SEM. Results: We found that PrEP awareness is strongly influenced by external factors such as social media and how much participants know about HIV treatment and prevention in the local community. However, while participants highlighted the importance of the internet/social media as a source of information about PrEP they talked of low PrEP literacy in their communities. Participants indicated that their own knowledge came as a result of joining the HIV vaccine trial preparedness study. However, some expressed doubts about the effectiveness of the drug and worried about side effects. Participants commented that at the community level PrEP was associated with being sexually active, because it was used to prevent the sexual transmission of HIV. As a result, some participants commented that one could feel judged by the health workers for asking for PrEP at health facilities in the community. Conclusion: The information collected in this study provided an understanding of the different layers of influence around individuals that are important to address to improve PrEP acceptability and uptake. Our findings can inform strategies to address the barriers to PrEP uptake, particularly at structural and community levels. Trial registration: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04066881.
KW - HIV
KW - PrEP literacy
KW - Pre-exposure prophylaxis
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85141549223&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1186/s12913-022-08730-8
DO - 10.1186/s12913-022-08730-8
M3 - Article
C2 - 36357877
AN - SCOPUS:85141549223
SN - 1472-6963
VL - 22
JO - BMC Health Services Research
JF - BMC Health Services Research
IS - 1
M1 - 1336
ER -