TY - JOUR
T1 - Evidence-Based Nursing Care for Spinal Nursing Immobilization
T2 - A Systematic Review
AU - Geldenhuys, Megan J.
AU - Downing, Charlene
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 Emergency Nurses Association
PY - 2020/5
Y1 - 2020/5
N2 - Introduction: A high degree of suspicion for spinal injury after trauma is commonplace in an emergency department, and spinal immobilization is considered an accepted intervention to prevent the progression of a potential injury. This systematic review was conducted to gain insight into the best research evidence related to nursing interventions for patients with trauma presenting with a suspected spinal injury. Methods: A systematic search of online databases was conducted in April 2019 for relevant research using specific search terms. The studies were selected on the basis of pre-established eligibility criteria, and the quality was appraised using the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme tool. Results: Nineteen included articles were synthesized thematically on the basis of the outcomes from interventions directed at a suspected spinal injury. The main findings were that spinal immobilization may compromise pulmonary function and airway management, cause pain and pressure ulcers, and be inappropriate with penetrating trauma. Furthermore, there was insufficient evidence to support the safety and efficacy of the hard neck collar and long backboard. Discussion: Patients would benefit from a more selective and cautious approach to spinal immobilization. Emergency nurses should use the evidence to facilitate informed decision-making in balancing the benefits of spinal immobilization against harm when considering the needs and values of the patient.
AB - Introduction: A high degree of suspicion for spinal injury after trauma is commonplace in an emergency department, and spinal immobilization is considered an accepted intervention to prevent the progression of a potential injury. This systematic review was conducted to gain insight into the best research evidence related to nursing interventions for patients with trauma presenting with a suspected spinal injury. Methods: A systematic search of online databases was conducted in April 2019 for relevant research using specific search terms. The studies were selected on the basis of pre-established eligibility criteria, and the quality was appraised using the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme tool. Results: Nineteen included articles were synthesized thematically on the basis of the outcomes from interventions directed at a suspected spinal injury. The main findings were that spinal immobilization may compromise pulmonary function and airway management, cause pain and pressure ulcers, and be inappropriate with penetrating trauma. Furthermore, there was insufficient evidence to support the safety and efficacy of the hard neck collar and long backboard. Discussion: Patients would benefit from a more selective and cautious approach to spinal immobilization. Emergency nurses should use the evidence to facilitate informed decision-making in balancing the benefits of spinal immobilization against harm when considering the needs and values of the patient.
KW - Emergency nursing
KW - Spinal immobilization
KW - Suspected spinal injury
KW - Trauma
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85084212109&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jen.2020.02.007
DO - 10.1016/j.jen.2020.02.007
M3 - Article
C2 - 32389205
AN - SCOPUS:85084212109
SN - 0099-1767
VL - 46
SP - 318
EP - 337
JO - Journal of Emergency Nursing
JF - Journal of Emergency Nursing
IS - 3
ER -