Abstract
The proof of the main theorem in the paper Henning et al. (1996) [2] is incorrect as it is missing an important case. Here we complete the proof by giving the missing case.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 1648 |
| Number of pages | 1 |
| Journal | Discrete Mathematics |
| Volume | 310 |
| Issue number | 10-11 |
| DOIs |
|
| Publication status | Published - 6 Jun 2010 |
Keywords
- Diameter
- Local edge domination critical
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Theoretical Computer Science
- Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Erratum to: "Local edge domination critical graphs" [Discrete Math. 161 (1996) 175-184] (DOI:10.1016/0012-365X(95)00222-I)'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver