Abstract
The essential dispute in global management of the Earth system is not whether planetary boundaries are being broached but whether it is appropriate to address these with managerialist strategies combining technical fixes and market mechanisms controlled by banks and corporations-as opposed to firm state regulatory mandates backed by tough civil society activism. Most of the attempts to “internalize market externalities” follow a trajectory of ecological modernization in analysis and policy, which abstracts from the dynamics of capital accumulation and the operation of power relations within multilateral governance. A theoretical framing (as developed by Marx, Luxemburg, and Harvey) assists in locating the wellsprings of ecological destruction, given the limits to strategies based on spatial, temporal, and capitalist/non-capitalist displacement of the underlying crisis tendencies. Many alternative discourses have emerged as a result of these obvious limitations in mainstream analysis and global governance strategies, to which global studies will increasingly contribute.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Title of host publication | The Oxford Handbook of Global Studies |
| Publisher | Oxford University Press |
| Pages | 663-680 |
| Number of pages | 18 |
| ISBN (Electronic) | 9780190630577 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 1 Jan 2018 |
| Externally published | Yes |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 8 Decent Work and Economic Growth
-
SDG 13 Climate Action
-
SDG 17 Partnerships for the Goals
Keywords
- Capitalism
- Carbon trading
- Crisis displacement
- Environment
- Market solutions
- Neoliberal nature
- Planetary boundaries
- Sustainable development
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- General Social Sciences
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Environmental critique'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver