Emerging powers in Africa: Is Brazil any different?

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

24 Citations (Scopus)


Africa's economic rise and growing prosperity over the past decade has attracted the attention of investors, development agencies and governments from across the globe. Brazil has joined this charge of established and emerging powers in Africa. Recent activities across the continent and the development of certain bilateral agreements suggest an alternative approach from other emerging powers in Africa, underpinned by development cooperation between Brazilian and African partners in key sectors. The 'Brazilian way', building on its positive image in Africa - primarily through development cooperation - while accumulating core commercial and strategic assets, appears to be aiming at sustainable engagement with long-term objectives. The explicit role of business in Brazil's development agenda in Africa sets it apart from traditional European and US counterparts, which have typically relied on donor-led aid and development. However, criticism has also crept in around Brazil's general reluctance to use its influence and commercial leverage to push for greater democratic freedoms in some of the African countries where it operates. While Brazil's commercial interests on the African continent are slightly different from commodity-starved players like India and China, which are explicitly reliant on extractive motives linked to price and efficiency, the question remains, 'Is Brazil's interest and engagement with Africa any different from the rest?'.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)117-136
Number of pages20
JournalSouth African Journal of International Affairs
Issue number1
Publication statusPublished - Apr 2013
Externally publishedYes


  • Africa
  • Brazil
  • development
  • emerging powers

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Political Science and International Relations


Dive into the research topics of 'Emerging powers in Africa: Is Brazil any different?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this