Divided against itself? Individual maxims and the redaction of Q

L. Howes

doi:10.4314/actat.v35i1.6

Divided against itself? Individual maxims and the redaction of Q

L. Howes

Languages, Cultural Studies and Applied Linguistics

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

In his analysis, Kloppenborg (1987) identified a number of logia in the main redaction that were more proverbial than prophetic in nature. This article considers the possibility that these sayings originally formed part of Q¹, but were added to Q² by the main redactor during the redactional process. It also explores the possibility that the main redactor not only inserted and interpolated prophetic material into Q¹, but also transformed original wisdom sayings into prophetic Q² material.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	96-114
Number of pages	19
Journal	Acta Theologica
Volume	35
Issue number	1
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.4314/actat.v35i1.6
Publication status	Published - 7 Jul 2015

Keywords

Kloppenborg
Maxims/Proverbs
Redaction
Sayings gospel q
Stratification

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Religious Studies

Access to Document

10.4314/actat.v35i1.6

Cite this

@article{cf2d796495694fc3bcad981d858f165d,

title = "Divided against itself? Individual maxims and the redaction of Q",

abstract = "In his analysis, Kloppenborg (1987) identified a number of logia in the main redaction that were more proverbial than prophetic in nature. This article considers the possibility that these sayings originally formed part of Q¹, but were added to Q² by the main redactor during the redactional process. It also explores the possibility that the main redactor not only inserted and interpolated prophetic material into Q¹, but also transformed original wisdom sayings into prophetic Q² material.",

keywords = "Kloppenborg, Maxims/Proverbs, Redaction, Sayings gospel q, Stratification",

author = "L. Howes",

note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2015 UV/UFS.",

year = "2015",

month = jul,

day = "7",

doi = "10.4314/actat.v35i1.6",

language = "English",

volume = "35",

pages = "96--114",

journal = "Acta Theologica",

issn = "1015-8758",

publisher = "University of the Free State",

number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Divided against itself? Individual maxims and the redaction of Q

AU - Howes, L.

PY - 2015/7/7

Y1 - 2015/7/7

N2 - In his analysis, Kloppenborg (1987) identified a number of logia in the main redaction that were more proverbial than prophetic in nature. This article considers the possibility that these sayings originally formed part of Q¹, but were added to Q² by the main redactor during the redactional process. It also explores the possibility that the main redactor not only inserted and interpolated prophetic material into Q¹, but also transformed original wisdom sayings into prophetic Q² material.

AB - In his analysis, Kloppenborg (1987) identified a number of logia in the main redaction that were more proverbial than prophetic in nature. This article considers the possibility that these sayings originally formed part of Q¹, but were added to Q² by the main redactor during the redactional process. It also explores the possibility that the main redactor not only inserted and interpolated prophetic material into Q¹, but also transformed original wisdom sayings into prophetic Q² material.

KW - Kloppenborg

KW - Maxims/Proverbs

KW - Redaction

KW - Sayings gospel q

KW - Stratification

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84936803862&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.4314/actat.v35i1.6

DO - 10.4314/actat.v35i1.6

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84936803862

SN - 1015-8758

VL - 35

SP - 96

EP - 114

JO - Acta Theologica

JF - Acta Theologica

IS - 1

ER -

Divided against itself? Individual maxims and the redaction of Q

Abstract

Keywords

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this