Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Dimensions of wisdom perception across twelve countries on five continents

  • M. Rudnev
  • , H. C. Barrett
  • , W. Buckwalter
  • , E. Machery
  • , S. Stich
  • , K. Barr
  • , A. Bencherifa
  • , R. F. Clancy
  • , D. L. Crone
  • , Y. Deguchi
  • , E. Fabiano
  • , A. D. Fodeman
  • , B. Guennoun
  • , J. Halamová
  • , T. Hashimoto
  • , J. Homan
  • , M. Kanovský
  • , K. Karasawa
  • , H. Kim
  • , J. Kiper
  • M. Lee, X. Liu, V. Mitova, R. B. Nair, L. Pantovic, B. Porter, P. Quintanilla, J. Reijer, P. P. Romero, P. Singh, S. Tber, D. A. Wilkenfeld, L. Yi, I. Grossmann
  • University of Waterloo
  • University of California at Los Angeles
  • George Mason University
  • University of Pittsburgh
  • University of Johannesburg
  • Rutgers - The State University of New Jersey, New Brunswick
  • International University of Rabat
  • Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University
  • Northeastern University
  • Kyoto University
  • University of Coimbra
  • Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
  • Ibn Tofail University
  • Comenius University
  • Toyo University
  • University of Kansas
  • The University of Tokyo
  • Korea University
  • University of Alabama at Birmingham
  • Seoul National University
  • Wuhan University
  • Indian Institute of Technology Delhi
  • University of Belgrade
  • Universidad San Francisco de Quito

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Wisdom is the hallmark of social judgment, but how people across cultures recognize wisdom remains unclear—distinct philosophical traditions suggest different views of wisdom’s cardinal features. We explore perception of wise minds across 16 socio-economically and culturally diverse convenience samples from 12 countries. Participants assessed wisdom exemplars, non-exemplars, and themselves on 19 socio-cognitive characteristics, subsequently rating targets’ wisdom, knowledge, and understanding. Analyses reveal two positively related dimensions—Reflective Orientation and Socio-Emotional Awareness. These dimensions are consistent across the studied cultural regions and interact when informing wisdom ratings: wisest targets—as perceived by participants—score high on both dimensions, whereas the least wise are not reflective but moderately socio-emotional. Additionally, individuals view themselves as less reflective but more socio-emotionally aware than most wisdom exemplars. Our findings expand folk psychology and social judgment research beyond the Global North, showing how individuals perceive desirable cognitive and socio-emotional qualities, and contribute to an understanding of mind perception.

Original languageEnglish
Article number6375
JournalNature Communications
Volume15
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2024

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • General Chemistry
  • General Biochemistry,Genetics and Molecular Biology
  • Multidisciplinary
  • General Physics and Astronomy

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Dimensions of wisdom perception across twelve countries on five continents'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this