TY - JOUR
T1 - Deposition, diagenesis, and secondary enrichment of metals in the paleoproterozoic Hotazel Iron Formation, Kalahari manganese field, South Africa
AU - Tsikos, Harilaos
AU - Beukes, Nicolas J.
AU - Moore, John M.
AU - Harris, Chris
PY - 2003/11
Y1 - 2003/11
N2 - The Kalahari manganese field in the Northern Cape province, South Africa, is a world-class manganese resource (ca. 8 billion tons at 20-48% Mn). It occurs within the Hotazel Formation in the uppermost Paleoproterozoic (2.65-2.05 Ga) Transvaal Supergroup and comprises three laminated Mn ore units interbedded with iron formation. Currently, mining of manganese is concentrated in two areas of the Kalahari manganese field, in the south and in the north of the field, which respectively contain low-grade (<40 wt % Mn) carbonate-rich ore, and high-grade, carbonate-free, oxide-rich ore (generally >44 wt % Mn). In the southern Kalahari manganese field, the iron formation contains quartz, magnetite, and carbonate (calcite, ankerite) as chief mineral constituents, and exhibits bulk chemical and isotopic signatures comparable to other Paleoproterozoic iron formations of the world. Carbonate isotope compositions in the iron formation (δ 12C = -18 to -4‰ vs. PDB; δ 18O = 12-20‰ vs. SMOW) indicate diagenetic processes involving oxidation of organic carbon, and reduction of Fe 3+ sedimentary precursors. Values from the inter-bedded manganiferous units (δ 13C = -12 to -8‰; δ 18O = 14-22‰) are interpreted to reflect similar processes, with Mn 4+ acting as the sole electron acceptor. Over large parts of the northern Kalahari manganese field, pre-1.9 Ga shales of the Olifantshoek Supergroup unconformably overlie the Hotazel Formation. In these areas, three diverse iron formation types were identified across the Hotazel stratigraphy (from bottom to top): (1) least-altered iron formation, which is identical to that seen in the southern Kalahari manganese field; (2) dolomitized iron formation, containing quartz, incipiently oxidized magnetite (to hematite), and Ca-Mn-enriched dolomite; (3) enriched iron formation, comprising exclusively SiO 2 (as quartz) and Fe oxide (as hematite). Mass balance calculations indicate that enriched iron formation formed through carbonate leaching and residual Fe 3+-enrichment of least-altered iron formation, accompanied by compaction and mass loss of ca. 20 percent. On the other hand, dolomitized iron formation resulted from partial Fe oxidation and carbonate dissolution-reprecipitation at depth, in the form of Ca-Mn-enriched dolomite. δ 18O values of the latter (20-21‰) are higher than those of earlier diagenetic carbonates by 2 per mil on average, whereas δ 18O values of secondary hematite in enriched iron formation are lower than those of precursor magnetite by approximately the same amount. This suggests the involvement of an isotopically light fluid (either meteoric water or a low-temperature hdyrothermal fluid) in the oxidation, leaching, and enrichment of the iron formation. The possibility emerges that extensive fluid flow in the Kalahari manganese field was related to the Hotazel/Olifantshoek unconformity.
AB - The Kalahari manganese field in the Northern Cape province, South Africa, is a world-class manganese resource (ca. 8 billion tons at 20-48% Mn). It occurs within the Hotazel Formation in the uppermost Paleoproterozoic (2.65-2.05 Ga) Transvaal Supergroup and comprises three laminated Mn ore units interbedded with iron formation. Currently, mining of manganese is concentrated in two areas of the Kalahari manganese field, in the south and in the north of the field, which respectively contain low-grade (<40 wt % Mn) carbonate-rich ore, and high-grade, carbonate-free, oxide-rich ore (generally >44 wt % Mn). In the southern Kalahari manganese field, the iron formation contains quartz, magnetite, and carbonate (calcite, ankerite) as chief mineral constituents, and exhibits bulk chemical and isotopic signatures comparable to other Paleoproterozoic iron formations of the world. Carbonate isotope compositions in the iron formation (δ 12C = -18 to -4‰ vs. PDB; δ 18O = 12-20‰ vs. SMOW) indicate diagenetic processes involving oxidation of organic carbon, and reduction of Fe 3+ sedimentary precursors. Values from the inter-bedded manganiferous units (δ 13C = -12 to -8‰; δ 18O = 14-22‰) are interpreted to reflect similar processes, with Mn 4+ acting as the sole electron acceptor. Over large parts of the northern Kalahari manganese field, pre-1.9 Ga shales of the Olifantshoek Supergroup unconformably overlie the Hotazel Formation. In these areas, three diverse iron formation types were identified across the Hotazel stratigraphy (from bottom to top): (1) least-altered iron formation, which is identical to that seen in the southern Kalahari manganese field; (2) dolomitized iron formation, containing quartz, incipiently oxidized magnetite (to hematite), and Ca-Mn-enriched dolomite; (3) enriched iron formation, comprising exclusively SiO 2 (as quartz) and Fe oxide (as hematite). Mass balance calculations indicate that enriched iron formation formed through carbonate leaching and residual Fe 3+-enrichment of least-altered iron formation, accompanied by compaction and mass loss of ca. 20 percent. On the other hand, dolomitized iron formation resulted from partial Fe oxidation and carbonate dissolution-reprecipitation at depth, in the form of Ca-Mn-enriched dolomite. δ 18O values of the latter (20-21‰) are higher than those of earlier diagenetic carbonates by 2 per mil on average, whereas δ 18O values of secondary hematite in enriched iron formation are lower than those of precursor magnetite by approximately the same amount. This suggests the involvement of an isotopically light fluid (either meteoric water or a low-temperature hdyrothermal fluid) in the oxidation, leaching, and enrichment of the iron formation. The possibility emerges that extensive fluid flow in the Kalahari manganese field was related to the Hotazel/Olifantshoek unconformity.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0742302283&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.2113/gsecongeo.98.7.1449
DO - 10.2113/gsecongeo.98.7.1449
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:0742302283
SN - 0361-0128
VL - 98
SP - 1449
EP - 1462
JO - Economic Geology
JF - Economic Geology
IS - 7
ER -