Cybercrime regulation at a cross-road: State and transnational laws versus global laws

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contributionpeer-review

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The proliferation of cybercrime necessitates all internet-connected states to be involved in cybercrime regulation. Although it has been stated that the internet per se and cyberspace in general are by its very nature ungovernable, many states have taken territorial control of the internet although the effectiveness of such control in cross-border crime commission may be questioned. The internet may very well become ungovernable if a nation-state takes a unilateral decision on which conduct constitutes permissible online conduct or endeavours to superimpose laws on other nation-states. It is therefore suggested that under the auspices of the United Nations and within an international law context the following issues should be addressed: conceptualizing the term "cybercrime" in establishing for example whether it includes a cyber-attack, determining which online conduct is permissible to ensure peace and security and initiating negotiations towards a Cybercrime Treaty.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationInternational Conference on Information Society, i-Society 2012
Pages71-75
Number of pages5
Publication statusPublished - 2012
Event2012 International Conference on Information Society, i-Society 2012 - London, United Kingdom
Duration: 25 Jun 201228 Jun 2012

Publication series

NameInternational Conference on Information Society, i-Society 2012

Conference

Conference2012 International Conference on Information Society, i-Society 2012
Country/TerritoryUnited Kingdom
CityLondon
Period25/06/1228/06/12

Keywords

  • cybercrime
  • global cybercrime laws
  • nation-state cybercrime laws

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Information Systems

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Cybercrime regulation at a cross-road: State and transnational laws versus global laws'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this