TY - JOUR
T1 - C−X Bond Activation by Palladium
T2 - Steric Shielding versus Steric Attraction
AU - Hansen, Thomas
AU - Sun, Xiaobo
AU - Dalla Tiezza, Marco
AU - van Zeist, Willem Jan
AU - van Stralen, Joost N.P.
AU - Geerke, Daan P.
AU - Wolters, Lando P.
AU - Poater, Jordi
AU - Hamlin, Trevor A.
AU - Bickelhaupt, F. Matthias
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 The Authors. Chemistry - A European Journal published by Wiley-VCH GmbH.
PY - 2022/8/4
Y1 - 2022/8/4
N2 - The C−X bond activation (X = H, C) of a series of substituted C(n°)−H and C(n°)−C(m°) bonds with C(n°) and C(m°) = H3C− (methyl, 0°), CH3H2C− (primary, 1°), (CH3)2HC− (secondary, 2°), (CH3)3C− (tertiary, 3°) by palladium were investigated using relativistic dispersion-corrected density functional theory at ZORA-BLYP-D3(BJ)/TZ2P. The effect of the stepwise introduction of substituents was pinpointed at the C−X bond on the bond activation process. The C(n°)−X bonds become substantially weaker going from C(0°)−X, to C(1°)−X, to C(2°)−X, to C(3°)−X because of the increasing steric repulsion between the C(n°)- and X-group. Interestingly, this often does not lead to a lower barrier for the C(n°)−X bond activation. The C−H activation barrier, for example, decreases from C(0°)−X, to C(1°)−X, to C(2°)−X and then increases again for the very crowded C(3°)−X bond. For the more congested C−C bond, in contrast, the activation barrier always increases as the degree of substitution is increased. Our activation strain and matching energy decomposition analyses reveal that these differences in C−H and C−C bond activation can be traced back to the opposing interplay between steric repulsion across the C−X bond versus that between the catalyst and substrate.
AB - The C−X bond activation (X = H, C) of a series of substituted C(n°)−H and C(n°)−C(m°) bonds with C(n°) and C(m°) = H3C− (methyl, 0°), CH3H2C− (primary, 1°), (CH3)2HC− (secondary, 2°), (CH3)3C− (tertiary, 3°) by palladium were investigated using relativistic dispersion-corrected density functional theory at ZORA-BLYP-D3(BJ)/TZ2P. The effect of the stepwise introduction of substituents was pinpointed at the C−X bond on the bond activation process. The C(n°)−X bonds become substantially weaker going from C(0°)−X, to C(1°)−X, to C(2°)−X, to C(3°)−X because of the increasing steric repulsion between the C(n°)- and X-group. Interestingly, this often does not lead to a lower barrier for the C(n°)−X bond activation. The C−H activation barrier, for example, decreases from C(0°)−X, to C(1°)−X, to C(2°)−X and then increases again for the very crowded C(3°)−X bond. For the more congested C−C bond, in contrast, the activation barrier always increases as the degree of substitution is increased. Our activation strain and matching energy decomposition analyses reveal that these differences in C−H and C−C bond activation can be traced back to the opposing interplay between steric repulsion across the C−X bond versus that between the catalyst and substrate.
KW - activation strain model
KW - bond activation
KW - density functional calculations
KW - homogeneous catalysis
KW - oxidative addition
KW - reactivity
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85131958101
U2 - 10.1002/chem.202201093
DO - 10.1002/chem.202201093
M3 - Article
C2 - 35420229
AN - SCOPUS:85131958101
SN - 0947-6539
VL - 28
JO - Chemistry - A European Journal
JF - Chemistry - A European Journal
IS - 44
M1 - e202201093
ER -