Abstract
Continuing professional teacher development (CPTD) is generally accepted as an indispensable tool for the professional development of technology teachers. The current theoretical framework for CPTD comprises a variety of models. However, criteria underpinning these models are not explicit. If, in turn, the criteria were explicit, it could serve as part of the pre-determined criteria for the evaluation of the quality of CPTD programmes. The quality of higher education is important to its stakeholders and the assurance thereof should be a continuous process. The aim of this article is to determine criteria for evaluating CPTD programmes through an analysis of CPTD models in different educational settings. The article takes the form of a literature study to determine which CPTD models exist and which aspects of such models are most suitable for facilitating development of technology teachers’ professional knowledge. A significant finding of this study is eight criteria for evaluating CPTD programmes.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 259-284 |
| Number of pages | 26 |
| Journal | International Journal of Technology and Design Education |
| Volume | 26 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 1 May 2016 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 4 Quality Education
Keywords
- Continuing professional teacher development
- Criteria for continuing professional development
- Models of continuing professional teacher development
- Technology education
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Education
- General Engineering
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Criteria for continuing professional development of technology teachers’ professional knowledge: a theoretical perspective'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver