@inbook{f1b5d28735984fef97a82c234fb9d8b1,
title = "Credibility and the Distribution of Epistemic Goods",
abstract = "What is the norm governing our credibility assessments of others? According to Miranda Fricker, the answer is “obvious”: we should match the level of credibility attributed to others to the evidence that they are offering the truth. In this paper, I will show that this evidentialist norm of credibility assessments is seriously wanting. In particular, I will identify and develop two kinds of testimonial injustice, which I call distributive and normative, and argue that this norm is fundamentally incapable of ruling them out. Finally, I will develop and defend an alternative norm—what I call the Wide Norm of Credibility—that not only avoids the problems afflicting the evidentialist version, but also makes vivid both the relational and normative dimensions of our credibility assessments.",
keywords = "Distributive testimonial injustice, Normative testimonial injustice, Norms of credibility, Testimony, Wide norm of credibility",
author = "Jennifer Lackey",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2018, Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature.",
year = "2018",
doi = "10.1007/978-3-319-95993-1_10",
language = "English",
series = "Synthese Library",
publisher = "Springer Science and Business Media B.V.",
pages = "145--168",
booktitle = "Synthese Library",
address = "Germany",
}