TY - JOUR
T1 - Corrigendum to “Diurnal dynamics of minor and trace elements in stream water draining Dongkemadi Glacier on the Tibetan Plateau and its environmental implications” [J. Hydrol. 541 (2016) 1104–1118](S0022169416305121)(10.1016/j.jhydrol.2016.08.021)
AU - Li, Xiangying
AU - He, Xiaobo
AU - Kang, Shichang
AU - Mika, Sillanpää
AU - Ding, Yongjian
AU - Han, Tianding
AU - Wu, Qingbai
AU - Yu, Zhongbo
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2017
PY - 2017/12
Y1 - 2017/12
N2 - The authors regret: At the Dongkemadi Glacier (DG) basin, daily and annual meltwater discharge at gauging section S1 should be corrected. Namely, annual discharge should be 2.74 × 107 m3 throughout 1 June to 30 September of 2013. Thus, variation in solute exports is controlled by changes in discharge and specific solute concentration (Fig. 9), and the estimated solute export, cation denudation rates (CDR) and discharge-normalized CDR are 417 tons, 185 Σ∗meq+m−2 and 189 Σ∗meq+m−3 (with annual specific discharge of 0.98 m) respectively in 2013 (Table 4). In comparison, the CDR at the DG basin is within the scope of previously published CDR (94–4200 Σ∗meq+m–2) from glacial catchments (Hodson et al., 2010). The discharge-normalized CDR is lower than the rates from most glacial catchments, but is higher than those from Mittivakkat (Greenland), S Cascade (N American) and Lewis River (Arctic) (Yde et al., 2004, 2014; Hodson et al., 2000, 2010). The authors would like to apologise for any inconvenience caused.
AB - The authors regret: At the Dongkemadi Glacier (DG) basin, daily and annual meltwater discharge at gauging section S1 should be corrected. Namely, annual discharge should be 2.74 × 107 m3 throughout 1 June to 30 September of 2013. Thus, variation in solute exports is controlled by changes in discharge and specific solute concentration (Fig. 9), and the estimated solute export, cation denudation rates (CDR) and discharge-normalized CDR are 417 tons, 185 Σ∗meq+m−2 and 189 Σ∗meq+m−3 (with annual specific discharge of 0.98 m) respectively in 2013 (Table 4). In comparison, the CDR at the DG basin is within the scope of previously published CDR (94–4200 Σ∗meq+m–2) from glacial catchments (Hodson et al., 2010). The discharge-normalized CDR is lower than the rates from most glacial catchments, but is higher than those from Mittivakkat (Greenland), S Cascade (N American) and Lewis River (Arctic) (Yde et al., 2004, 2014; Hodson et al., 2000, 2010). The authors would like to apologise for any inconvenience caused.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85034452802&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2017.11.019
DO - 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2017.11.019
M3 - Comment/debate
AN - SCOPUS:85034452802
SN - 0022-1694
VL - 555
SP - 995
JO - Journal of Hydrology
JF - Journal of Hydrology
ER -