TY - JOUR
T1 - CONTACT DERMATITIS IN A COSMETOLOGIST AND THE RAMIFICATION OF OCCUPATIONAL AND NON-OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURES IN DISEASE PROGNOSIS
AU - Fourie, Anna
AU - Singh, Tanusha
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2022, Allergy Society of South Africa. All rights reserved.
PY - 2022/6/1
Y1 - 2022/6/1
N2 - Cosmetologists may specialise in different types of beauty treatment, including hairdressing, the application of cosmetics, manicures or pedicures (including nail adornment) and body massage therapy. In this case, a 27-year-old cosmetologist with work-aggravated contact dermatitis is discussed. She developed severe contact dermatitis of the hands. The case illustrates the challenges in determining whether the condition is occupational or work-aggravated, which is important in limiting exposure to the causative agents. As the reactions were around her fingernails and on her fingers and she worked with hairdressing chemicals, the patient was asked to submit herself to testing to determine whether she was sensitised to the chemicals used in hairdressing and/or nail treatment or adornment processes. Using both hairdressing and meth(acrylate) series of patches, patch tests were done to determine whether the hairdressing products she used regularly and/or the acrylate-based nail products, which are applied to both her clients’ and her own nails, were the causative agents. Sensitisation to substances from both series was detected and the chemicals were found in both the products used in the workplace and those for personal use. The importance and the complexity of managing patients with both occupational and non-occupational exposures are highlighted in this study.
AB - Cosmetologists may specialise in different types of beauty treatment, including hairdressing, the application of cosmetics, manicures or pedicures (including nail adornment) and body massage therapy. In this case, a 27-year-old cosmetologist with work-aggravated contact dermatitis is discussed. She developed severe contact dermatitis of the hands. The case illustrates the challenges in determining whether the condition is occupational or work-aggravated, which is important in limiting exposure to the causative agents. As the reactions were around her fingernails and on her fingers and she worked with hairdressing chemicals, the patient was asked to submit herself to testing to determine whether she was sensitised to the chemicals used in hairdressing and/or nail treatment or adornment processes. Using both hairdressing and meth(acrylate) series of patches, patch tests were done to determine whether the hairdressing products she used regularly and/or the acrylate-based nail products, which are applied to both her clients’ and her own nails, were the causative agents. Sensitisation to substances from both series was detected and the chemicals were found in both the products used in the workplace and those for personal use. The importance and the complexity of managing patients with both occupational and non-occupational exposures are highlighted in this study.
KW - contact dermatitis
KW - cosmetologist
KW - hairdressing
KW - non-occupational exposure
KW - occupational exposure
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85139123379&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.520/ejc-caci-v35-n2-a10
DO - 10.520/ejc-caci-v35-n2-a10
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85139123379
SN - 1609-3607
VL - 35
SP - 106
EP - 111
JO - Current Allergy and Clinical Immunology
JF - Current Allergy and Clinical Immunology
IS - 2
ER -