Construction Robotics and Human–Robot Teams Research Methods

Adetayo Olugbenga Onososen, Innocent Musonda, Molusiwa Ramabodu

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

14 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Though studies in construction robotics and human–robot teams research have explored varying themes, an in-depth study of the state-of-the-art of methodological paradigms appropriate for construction robotics research is hitherto lacking, taking into consideration that several studies have highlighted conflicting methodological components such as research design, methods, data sources, data types and analytical techniques. To better understand this underexplored area, this study uses a four-stage review approach utilising a scientometric and systematic analysis method based on 112 articles. Using statistical analysis to evaluate the relationship between research components, the study reveals strong associations between components of research methods, data sources and analytical techniques. Researchers are also increasingly looking to mixed paradigms in data sources and designs, highlighting a methodological plurality in construction robotics research. Implications on what this means for the future of construction robotics, policy and stakeholders are discussed in the study.

Original languageEnglish
Article number1192
JournalBuildings
Volume12
Issue number8
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Aug 2022

Keywords

  • cobots
  • collaborative robots
  • construction robotics
  • human-technology interaction
  • human–robot teams
  • mixed review
  • research methods
  • scientiometric
  • systematic review

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Architecture
  • Civil and Structural Engineering
  • Building and Construction

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Construction Robotics and Human–Robot Teams Research Methods'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this