Conceptualisation of the consultancy pricing paradox

De Graft Owusu-Manu, Edward Badu, David J. Edwards, Michael Adesi, Gary D. Holt

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: Despite widespread demand for consultants and especially within the surveying profession, driving forces of service/pricing/quality are not fully understood and have received minimal research attention. The purpose of this paper is to review contemporary knowledge in this field, highlighting en route the dilemmas of the consultancy pricing paradox. Design/methodology/approach: Methodology is of axiological, philosophical tradition - induction and inference, generalized concepts and theories. A critique of extant literature underpins a theoretical pricing problem framework, a future research agenda, and a model of the pricing paradox. Findings: The study elucidates paradoxical aspects regarding value perceptions, objectives, strategies, cost recovery, competition and systematic processes. It conceptually models the dilemma of service pricing and suggests a research agenda based on process and value, nature of service, competence and branding. Research limitations/implications: The formalisation of the paradox and development of the conceptual model opens opportunities for a new research agenda in the future, which is highlighted as part of the study. Practical implications: Advancement of theory will impact pricing paradigms. Originality/value: The paper presents a novel conceptualisation of the subject.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)357-378
Number of pages22
JournalStructural Survey
Volume30
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Aug 2012
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Consultants
  • Fees
  • Pricing policy
  • Quality
  • Research
  • Surveying
  • Value

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Civil and Structural Engineering
  • Building and Construction

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Conceptualisation of the consultancy pricing paradox'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this