Comparing vibratory and impact laboratory compaction methods

D. P. Lange, G. Fanourakis

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contributionpeer-review

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Laboratory analysis carried out on different soils shows that vibratory and impact compaction produce different results. Standard methods based on BS 1377: 1975 using the vibratory hammer and mod AASHTO for impact were applied. Results obtained for maximum dry density and optimum moisture content were compared for each soil. It was found that the vibratory method was more suitable than impact for non-cohesive soils and gravels. Cohesive soils reached maximum compaction at higher moisture contents using vibration as opposed to impact, but at lower densities. It is clear that field densities under vibratory compaction would be difficult to achieve where the laboratory control method was based on impact.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationProceedings of the 17th International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering
Subtitle of host publicationThe Academia and Practice of Geotechnical Engineering
Pages93-96
Number of pages4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2009
Event17th International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, ICSMGE 2009 - Alexandria, Egypt
Duration: 5 Oct 20099 Oct 2009

Publication series

NameProceedings of the 17th International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering: The Academia and Practice of Geotechnical Engineering
Volume1

Conference

Conference17th International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, ICSMGE 2009
Country/TerritoryEgypt
CityAlexandria
Period5/10/099/10/09

Keywords

  • Density
  • Impact
  • Moisture content
  • Soil compaction
  • Vibratory compaction

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Geotechnical Engineering and Engineering Geology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Comparing vibratory and impact laboratory compaction methods'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this