Abstract
Creativity is often misunderstood due to inconsistencies concerning the definition of creativity, the methodologies used to explain creativity as a phenomenon and the various measurement instruments to determine creative ability. This article aimed to compare two conceptual frameworks to identify the most reliable and valid conceptual framework t measure creativity at a university. The findings showed that both conceptual frameworks are different in their own right and both are valid and reliable. Only marginal differences could be observed from the statistical tests used in the comparative analysis. The uniqueness and value of the paper lies in the validation of these conceptual frameworks to measure creativity.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 46-58 |
| Number of pages | 13 |
| Journal | Problems and Perspectives in Management |
| Volume | 12 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| Publication status | Published - 2014 |
Keywords
- Comparative analysis
- Creativity measurement instruments
- Creativity models
- Factors
- Pearson correlations
- Pure factors
- Variance explained
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Business and International Management
- General Business,Management and Accounting
- Sociology and Political Science
- Public Administration
- Strategy and Management
- Information Systems and Management
- Law