TY - JOUR
T1 - Citizenship education in Chinese scholarly discourse
T2 - Challenging essentialist understandings of what it means to educate citizens for the future
AU - Li, Hui
AU - Zhang, Junqiao
AU - Tan, Chuanbao
AU - Kennedy, Kerry John
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 Journal of Moral Education Ltd.
PY - 2025
Y1 - 2025
N2 - The purpose of this paper is to clarify the concept of citizenship education in Chinese scholarly discourse. Using Heater’s framework, the findings are shown within the four dimensions: geography, elements, outcomes, and essence. These dimensions are isolated from one another, and the connections between them remain unexplored. From the perspective of geography, element and outcome, China’s citizenship education places greater emphasis on fostering national citizenship, integrating the achievements of world civilization with the unique characteristics of Chinese society and promoting comprehensive development in civic knowledge, values, and skills. In the dimension of essence, which is not explicitly addressed in Heater’s framework, Chinese scholars identify citizenship education as encompassing two contradictory essences: political socialization and development of subjectivity. The reasons for this can be attributed to two main factors: the history of citizenship education is short and has been significantly influenced by authoritarian governments with a defined policy orientation.
AB - The purpose of this paper is to clarify the concept of citizenship education in Chinese scholarly discourse. Using Heater’s framework, the findings are shown within the four dimensions: geography, elements, outcomes, and essence. These dimensions are isolated from one another, and the connections between them remain unexplored. From the perspective of geography, element and outcome, China’s citizenship education places greater emphasis on fostering national citizenship, integrating the achievements of world civilization with the unique characteristics of Chinese society and promoting comprehensive development in civic knowledge, values, and skills. In the dimension of essence, which is not explicitly addressed in Heater’s framework, Chinese scholars identify citizenship education as encompassing two contradictory essences: political socialization and development of subjectivity. The reasons for this can be attributed to two main factors: the history of citizenship education is short and has been significantly influenced by authoritarian governments with a defined policy orientation.
KW - Citizenship education
KW - four dimensions
KW - localization
KW - scholarly discourse
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105007537268
U2 - 10.1080/03057240.2025.2498772
DO - 10.1080/03057240.2025.2498772
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:105007537268
SN - 0305-7240
JO - Journal of Moral Education
JF - Journal of Moral Education
ER -