Abstract
To maximise the potential impact and acceptability of EIDM capacity building, there is a need for programmes to coordinate their remits within existing systems, playing both 'insider' and 'outsider' roles. Through a review of the South African evidence-policy landscape and analysis of a stakeholder event that brought together EIDM role players, this paper illustrates how one capacity-building programme navigated its position within the national evidence-policy interface. It identifies strategies for improving the acceptability and potential effectiveness of donor-funded EIDM capacity-building activities: understanding the evidence-policy interface, incorporating programmes into the decision-making infrastructure (being an 'insider'), whilst retaining an element of neutrality (being an 'outsider').
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 241-258 |
Number of pages | 18 |
Journal | Evidence and Policy |
Volume | 14 |
Issue number | 2 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - May 2018 |
Keywords
- Capacity building
- Evidence use
- Evidence-informed decision making
- South Africa
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Social Sciences (miscellaneous)