Abstract
In South Africa, at a time when National Health Insurance should be generously funded (7 years after its approval as public policy by the ruling party), state fiscal austerity appears certain to nip the initiative in the bud. The World Bank and the International Monetary Fund issued separate reports about South Africa in late 2014, following a new finance minister's mid-term budget speech. In justifying austerity, they revealed 2 important conceptual blockages regarding inequality and international financial relations. The resulting political bias in the macroeconomic debate has, in turn, given neoliberal policy advocates intellectual weaponry to impose deeper austerity. In contrast, the rise of a "united front" of labor, community-based, and social movement activists, along with a vigorous left opposition party in Parliament, ensure that one of the world's most visible class struggles ratchets up in intensity in the years ahead.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 415-442 |
Number of pages | 28 |
Journal | International Journal of Health Services |
Volume | 45 |
Issue number | 3 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - Jul 2015 |
Externally published | Yes |
Keywords
- Austerity
- Gini Coefficient
- Inequality
- International Monetary Fund
- Neoliberalism
- Social grants
- Vulnerability
- World Bank
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Health Policy
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Bretton woods institution narratives about inequality and economic vulnerability on the Eve of South African austerity'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Press/Media
-
South Africa: Resistance Rises To World Bank's Climate-Killing Mega-Projects – Analysis
19/10/22
1 item of Media coverage
Press/Media
-
In South Africa, Resistance Rises to the World Bank’s Climate-Killing Mega-Projects
19/10/22
1 item of Media coverage
Press/Media
-
In South Africa, Resistance Rises to the World Bank’s Climate-Killing Mega-Projects
18/10/22
1 item of Media coverage
Press/Media