Abstract
Blessed relationships (BRs) bring together technology, sexuality, and economics within a consumerist environment. Academic literature has used ‘blesser’ and ‘sugar daddy’ interchangeably, and online reports have explained how BRs, as a new South African cultural option of structuring relationships, differ from sugar relationships because they represent a new product on offer in relationship shopping. This essay critically evaluates academic and selected online sources to understand the allure and controversy of BRs. Research focuses predominantly on ‘controversial’ frames of health and moral risks. However, labels, such as ‘blesser’ and ‘sugar daddy’ discursively construct different sexual domains. After reviewing literature and online information, the essay presents a nomenclature of transactional relationships that considers the agential and discursive subtleties of BRs. Implications and research recommendations for the structuring of relationships, given newer options for lifestyle, companionship, and sexuality, which BRs have made publicly visible, conclude the essay.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 21-40 |
| Number of pages | 20 |
| Journal | Acta Academica |
| Volume | 51 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 9 Dec 2019 |
Keywords
- Blessee
- Blesser
- Relationships
- South Africa
- Sugar daddy
- Transactional sex
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- General Arts and Humanities
- General Social Sciences