Beyond prejudice: Relational inequality, collective action, and social change revisited

John Dixon, Mark Levine, Steve Reicher, Kevin Durrheim

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

27 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This response clarifies, qualifies, and develops our critique of the limits of intergroup liking as a means of challenging intergroup inequality. It does not dispute that dominant groups may espouse negative attitudes towards subordinate groups. Nor does it dispute that prejudice reduction can be an effective way of tackling resulting forms of intergroup hostility. What it does dispute is the assumption that getting dominant group members and subordinate group members to like each other more is the best way of improving intergroup relations that are characterized by relatively stable, institutionally embedded, relations of inequality. In other words, the main target of our critique is the model of change that underlies prejudice reduction interventions and the mainstream concept of prejudice on which they are based.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)451-466
Number of pages16
JournalBehavioral and Brain Sciences
Volume35
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2012
Externally publishedYes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology
  • Physiology
  • Behavioral Neuroscience

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Beyond prejudice: Relational inequality, collective action, and social change revisited'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this