Benefits and challenges of engaging Majority World children in interdisciplinary, multi-qualitative-method, mental health research

Michelle O’Reilly, Sadiyya Haffejee, Seyda Eruyar, Grace Sykes, Panos Vostanis

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

The qualitative community embraces transparent dialogue through sharing knowledge to improve rigour and develop new initiatives. In this paper, we recognise there are many complexities within qualitative research, leading to important debates. We explore the benefits and challenges, as well as the practicalities and technicalities, of conducting research that 1) employs multiple methods within the qualitative paradigm, 2) is interdisciplinary, and 3) examines a sensitive research topic 4) with a vulnerable group of participants. Specifically, when research is also 5) cross-cultural and 6) utilises participatory techniques. Through our discussion, we draw upon an existing project and examine the complexity of designing and completing intra-paradigmatic mixed methods research with children from different sociocultural contexts, underpinned by interdisciplinary perspectives, in a complex area like mental health.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)219-233
Number of pages15
JournalInternational Journal of Social Research Methodology: Theory and Practice
Volume27
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2024

Keywords

  • children
  • intra-paradigmatic
  • majority world
  • mental health
  • Qualitative methods
  • vulnerability

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • General Social Sciences

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Benefits and challenges of engaging Majority World children in interdisciplinary, multi-qualitative-method, mental health research'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this