Behavioural perspectives in forex portfolio value analysis

Kofi Agyarko Ababio, Necati Alp Erilli, Eric Nkansah, Jules Clement Mba

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

This paper combines Cumulative Prospect Theory (CPT) and the Grey Clustering Algorithm (GCA) to guide the optimization of forex portfolio selection. The United States Dollar (USD) against a universe of 84 other currencies was used for portfolio value analysis using the Differential Evolution Algorithm. A total of six portfolios were constructed of which two were based on the CPT and the remaining on the GCA. The optimisation results of all constructed portfolios show that the GC-based portfolios outperformed the CPT-based portfolios. Specifically, GC Portfolio 4, comprising assets with higher CPT values in GC 1, emerged as the best-performing portfolio with a Sharpe ratio of 0.8497, significantly surpassing the highest Sharpe ratio among CPT-based portfolios (0.0206 for CPT Portfolio 2), further reinforcing the superiority of GCA in portfolio optimisation. The inclusion of the behavioural proxy in portfolio construction has a significant impact on adding value to investors' portfolios. Future research could explore refining asset selection by integrating machine learning techniques such as K-means clustering or reinforcement learning to enhance portfolio robustness.

Original languageEnglish
Article number2494135
JournalCogent Economics and Finance
Volume13
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2025
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Behavioural finance
  • cumulative prospect theory
  • decision-making
  • Economic Psychology
  • Economics
  • finance
  • Finance
  • forex
  • Mathematical Finance
  • optimisation
  • portfolio
  • Quantitative Finance
  • Statistics for Business, Finance & Economics

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Finance
  • Economics and Econometrics

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Behavioural perspectives in forex portfolio value analysis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this