Assessing the status of sustainable development goal 5 (gender equality) in South African context

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

In the context of South Africa, the study evaluates the state of Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) 5 (focus). There are still many public and private organisations, corporations, public service departments, and local, provincial, and national government levels that exhibit gender inequality. Owing to the topic's comprehensiveness, the study only examines the current state of gender equality at the local level (locus), as there are few discussions of the SDGs in a localised setting. In South Africa, discrimination against women has long existed. The persistent patriarchy could serve as evidence for this. Historically, men have been chosen for strategic appointments and promoted to higher positions. There have been several attempts in the last few years to stop this tendency, but it still exists despite various acts and legislative frameworks. What are the factors contributing to gender inequality and impeding the achievement of SDG 5 in South African local government? is the primary research question that forms part of the study. The article uses a qualitative desktop analysis to collect data and draw conclusions. The data was gathered through a review of the literature, which involved using a variety of academic journals, research projects, dissertations, and official documents. Document analysis as well as conceptual analysis were used to evaluate the data. Preserving equality and human rights has been one of the goals since the nation became democratic in 1994. The Bill of Rights in South Africa forbids all forms of discrimination and acts as a legal guarantee of gender equality. The United Nations Habitat 2008 documents state that the country's highest legal framework, the 1996 Constitution, requires the implementation of equality-promoting measures. This is mandated by the Affirmative Action Act, which calls for racial and gender equality to be balanced. Additionally, given the stark underrepresentation, it promotes government initiatives to support women's empowerment in the workplace and gender-based participation in decision-making platforms. But research reveals that barriers still exist that keep women out of political and administrative roles in South Africa, even with all the tools at their disposal—including institutional policies, legislative frameworks, and political will. It appears that the government is not acting forcefully enough to stop this from happening. To stop this trend from continuing, the government must act decisively to buck the trend. To do this, it is necessary to implement severe penalties for violators of the nation's laws and policies aimed at empowering women and to take campaigns and actions seriously. This article suggests implementing civic education to ensure the continued success of South Africa's relationship with culture and gender equality. The article makes the argument that gender inequality is a problem that needs to be addressed constantly, and that strategic discussions and solutions are needed. The article's objective was to start a conversation that would necessitate practitioners and policymakers joining the platform. To produce a longitudinal study of substantial value and contribute to the fields of gender studies, local government, and public administration, a consistent effort will be made to publish papers on this subject on a continuous basis.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)35-44
Number of pages10
JournalOIDA International Journal of Sustainable Development
Volume17
Issue number12
Publication statusPublished - 2024
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • gender
  • gender equality
  • qualitative research
  • South Africa
  • sustainable development goal 5

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Development
  • Geography, Planning and Development
  • Health (social science)
  • Gender Studies

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Assessing the status of sustainable development goal 5 (gender equality) in South African context'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this