Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Application of a fish health assessment index and associated parasite index to Clarias gariepinus (Teleostei: Clariidae) in the Vaal River system, South Africa

  • University of Johannesburg
  • Clinvet International Pty Ltd

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

27 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The aim of this study was to determine if the fish health assessment index (HAI) developed in the USA and associated parasite index (PI), when applied to Clarias gariepinus at two localities in the upper and middle Vaal River system, could distinguish between localities on the grounds of water quality. Elevated HAI values, correlating with poorer chemical and physical water quality, were recorded from the Vaal River Barrage site. Parasite data were congruent with the main PI premise that prevalence and intensity of endoparasite infection would be higher at the more polluted locality, with the converse being recorded for ectoparasites. It was therefore possible to distinguish between localities with different water quality, based on parasites present on the hosts.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)261-272
Number of pages12
JournalAfrican Journal of Aquatic Science
Volume34
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Nov 2009

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
  2. SDG 6 - Clean Water and Sanitation
    SDG 6 Clean Water and Sanitation

Keywords

  • Aquatic health
  • Biological monitoring
  • Environmental management
  • Indicator species
  • Vaal dam
  • Vaal river barrage

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
  • Aquatic Science

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Application of a fish health assessment index and associated parasite index to Clarias gariepinus (Teleostei: Clariidae) in the Vaal River system, South Africa'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this