Alcohol interventions for persons with HIV: Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials using phosphatidylethanol and self-report

  • Judith A. Hahn
  • , Jeremy C. Kane
  • , Robin Fatch
  • , Cristina Espinosa da Silva
  • , Nneka I. Emenyonu
  • , Aaron Scheffler
  • , Priya Chirayil
  • , Kaku So-Armah
  • , Christopher W. Kahler
  • , Amy A. Conroy
  • , E. Jennifer Edelman
  • , Sarah Woolf-King
  • , Charles DH Parry
  • , Susan M. Kiene
  • , Gabriel Chamie
  • , Winnie R. Muyindike
  • , Julian Adong
  • , Vivian F. Go
  • , Robert L. Cook
  • , Neo K. Morojele
  • David A. Fiellin, Glenn Milo Santos, Peggy Tahir, Jeffrey Samet, Evgeny Krupitsky, Isabel Elaine Allen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Background: Interventions are needed to reduce alcohol use for people living with HIV (PWH), but prior randomized controlled trials (RCT) evaluated efficacy by self-reported alcohol use, potentially hampering validity. We aimed to determine alcohol intervention efficacy using the alcohol biomarker, phosphatidylethanol (PEth), combined with self-report, and compare results to each analysed alone. Methods: We conducted a systematic review of alcohol intervention RCTs to April 2023, followed by an individual participant data meta-analysis (IPD-MA) using two-step random effects modeling. Our primary outcome was unhealthy alcohol use defined as PEth/self-report (binary), i.e., PEth≥ 50 ng/mL or Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test – Consumption (AUDIT-C) ≥ 3 (women) and ≥ 4 (men). We also evaluated PEth and self-report alone. Results: We screened 280 studies, found 20 eligible, and obtained IPD for 16 (N = 3559, median age=41, 72.8 % male). Participants receiving an alcohol intervention had significantly lower odds of follow-up unhealthy alcohol use by PEth/self-report (OR=0.69, 95 % CI: 0.55–0.86; Cohen's d=0.21; I2=29.4 %, 95 % CI: 0.0 %-62.8 %). Risk-of-bias assessment indicated low or moderate risk. The certainty of evidence was moderate. Findings for PEth alone (OR=0.81, 95 % CI: 0.69–0.97; Cohen's d=0.12; I2=5.7 %, 95 % CI: 0.0 %-49.5 %) and self-report alone (OR=0.67, 95 % CI: 0.50–0.89; Cohen's d=0.22; I2=68.7 %, 95 % CI: 6.6 %-84.5 %) outcomes were similar, but heterogeneity was greater for self-report alone. Findings were robust to higher PEth/self-report cutoffs and continuous measures. Conclusions: Results confirm prior findings of significant efficacy of alcohol interventions for PWH. Effect sizes were small across measurements, while heterogeneity was high when using self-report alone. Combined PEth/self-report is a useful primary outcome for alcohol intervention studies.

Original languageEnglish
Article number112879
JournalDrug and Alcohol Dependence
Volume276
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Nov 2025

Keywords

  • Alcohol
  • Alcohol biomarker
  • Alcohol use
  • HIV
  • Individual participant data meta-analysis
  • PEth
  • Phosphatidylethanol
  • Randomized controlled trial
  • Systematic review
  • Unhealthy

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Toxicology
  • Pharmacology
  • Psychiatry and Mental Health
  • Pharmacology (medical)

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Alcohol interventions for persons with HIV: Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials using phosphatidylethanol and self-report'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this