TY - JOUR
T1 - Alcohol interventions for persons with HIV
T2 - Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials using phosphatidylethanol and self-report
AU - Hahn, Judith A.
AU - Kane, Jeremy C.
AU - Fatch, Robin
AU - Espinosa da Silva, Cristina
AU - Emenyonu, Nneka I.
AU - Scheffler, Aaron
AU - Chirayil, Priya
AU - So-Armah, Kaku
AU - Kahler, Christopher W.
AU - Conroy, Amy A.
AU - Edelman, E. Jennifer
AU - Woolf-King, Sarah
AU - Parry, Charles DH
AU - Kiene, Susan M.
AU - Chamie, Gabriel
AU - Muyindike, Winnie R.
AU - Adong, Julian
AU - Go, Vivian F.
AU - Cook, Robert L.
AU - Morojele, Neo K.
AU - Fiellin, David A.
AU - Santos, Glenn Milo
AU - Tahir, Peggy
AU - Samet, Jeffrey
AU - Krupitsky, Evgeny
AU - Allen, Isabel Elaine
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2025
PY - 2025/11/1
Y1 - 2025/11/1
N2 - Background: Interventions are needed to reduce alcohol use for people living with HIV (PWH), but prior randomized controlled trials (RCT) evaluated efficacy by self-reported alcohol use, potentially hampering validity. We aimed to determine alcohol intervention efficacy using the alcohol biomarker, phosphatidylethanol (PEth), combined with self-report, and compare results to each analysed alone. Methods: We conducted a systematic review of alcohol intervention RCTs to April 2023, followed by an individual participant data meta-analysis (IPD-MA) using two-step random effects modeling. Our primary outcome was unhealthy alcohol use defined as PEth/self-report (binary), i.e., PEth≥ 50 ng/mL or Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test – Consumption (AUDIT-C) ≥ 3 (women) and ≥ 4 (men). We also evaluated PEth and self-report alone. Results: We screened 280 studies, found 20 eligible, and obtained IPD for 16 (N = 3559, median age=41, 72.8 % male). Participants receiving an alcohol intervention had significantly lower odds of follow-up unhealthy alcohol use by PEth/self-report (OR=0.69, 95 % CI: 0.55–0.86; Cohen's d=0.21; I2=29.4 %, 95 % CI: 0.0 %-62.8 %). Risk-of-bias assessment indicated low or moderate risk. The certainty of evidence was moderate. Findings for PEth alone (OR=0.81, 95 % CI: 0.69–0.97; Cohen's d=0.12; I2=5.7 %, 95 % CI: 0.0 %-49.5 %) and self-report alone (OR=0.67, 95 % CI: 0.50–0.89; Cohen's d=0.22; I2=68.7 %, 95 % CI: 6.6 %-84.5 %) outcomes were similar, but heterogeneity was greater for self-report alone. Findings were robust to higher PEth/self-report cutoffs and continuous measures. Conclusions: Results confirm prior findings of significant efficacy of alcohol interventions for PWH. Effect sizes were small across measurements, while heterogeneity was high when using self-report alone. Combined PEth/self-report is a useful primary outcome for alcohol intervention studies.
AB - Background: Interventions are needed to reduce alcohol use for people living with HIV (PWH), but prior randomized controlled trials (RCT) evaluated efficacy by self-reported alcohol use, potentially hampering validity. We aimed to determine alcohol intervention efficacy using the alcohol biomarker, phosphatidylethanol (PEth), combined with self-report, and compare results to each analysed alone. Methods: We conducted a systematic review of alcohol intervention RCTs to April 2023, followed by an individual participant data meta-analysis (IPD-MA) using two-step random effects modeling. Our primary outcome was unhealthy alcohol use defined as PEth/self-report (binary), i.e., PEth≥ 50 ng/mL or Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test – Consumption (AUDIT-C) ≥ 3 (women) and ≥ 4 (men). We also evaluated PEth and self-report alone. Results: We screened 280 studies, found 20 eligible, and obtained IPD for 16 (N = 3559, median age=41, 72.8 % male). Participants receiving an alcohol intervention had significantly lower odds of follow-up unhealthy alcohol use by PEth/self-report (OR=0.69, 95 % CI: 0.55–0.86; Cohen's d=0.21; I2=29.4 %, 95 % CI: 0.0 %-62.8 %). Risk-of-bias assessment indicated low or moderate risk. The certainty of evidence was moderate. Findings for PEth alone (OR=0.81, 95 % CI: 0.69–0.97; Cohen's d=0.12; I2=5.7 %, 95 % CI: 0.0 %-49.5 %) and self-report alone (OR=0.67, 95 % CI: 0.50–0.89; Cohen's d=0.22; I2=68.7 %, 95 % CI: 6.6 %-84.5 %) outcomes were similar, but heterogeneity was greater for self-report alone. Findings were robust to higher PEth/self-report cutoffs and continuous measures. Conclusions: Results confirm prior findings of significant efficacy of alcohol interventions for PWH. Effect sizes were small across measurements, while heterogeneity was high when using self-report alone. Combined PEth/self-report is a useful primary outcome for alcohol intervention studies.
KW - Alcohol
KW - Alcohol biomarker
KW - Alcohol use
KW - HIV
KW - Individual participant data meta-analysis
KW - PEth
KW - Phosphatidylethanol
KW - Randomized controlled trial
KW - Systematic review
KW - Unhealthy
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105016827588
U2 - 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2025.112879
DO - 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2025.112879
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:105016827588
SN - 0376-8716
VL - 276
JO - Drug and Alcohol Dependence
JF - Drug and Alcohol Dependence
M1 - 112879
ER -