Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

A template for an improved rock-based subdivision of the pre-Cryogenian timescale

  • Graham A. Shields
  • , Robin A. Strachan
  • , Susannah M. Porter
  • , Galen P. Halverson
  • , Francis A. Macdonald
  • , Kenneth A. Plumb
  • , Carlos J. de Alvarenga
  • , Dhiraj M. Banerjee
  • , Andrey Bekker
  • , Wouter Bleeker
  • , Alexander Brasier
  • , Partha P. Chakraborty
  • , Alan S. Collins
  • , Kent Condie
  • , Kaushik Das
  • , David A.D. Evans
  • , Richard Ernst
  • , Anthony E. Fallick
  • , Hartwig Frimmel
  • , Reinhardt Fuck
  • Paul F. Hoffman, Balz S. Kamber, Anton B. Kuznetsov, Ross N. Mitchell, Daniel G. Poiré, Simon W. Poulton, Robert Riding, Mukund Sharma, Craig Storey, Eva Stueeken, Rosalie Tostevin, Elizabeth Turner, Shuhai Xiao, Shuanhong Zhang, Ying Zhou, Maoyan Zhu
  • University College London
  • University of Portsmouth
  • University of California at Santa Barbara
  • McGill University
  • Geoscience Australia
  • Universidade de Brasília
  • University of Delhi
  • University of California at Riverside
  • Natural Resources Canada
  • University of Aberdeen
  • University of Adelaide
  • New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology
  • Hiroshima University
  • Yale University
  • Carleton University
  • Tomsk State University
  • Scottish Universities Research and Reactor Centre
  • University of Würzburg
  • Harvard University
  • University of Victoria BC
  • Queensland University of Technology
  • Russian Academy of Sciences
  • Chinese Academy of Sciences
  • Universidad Nacional de La Plata
  • University of Leeds
  • University of Tennessee, Knoxville
  • Birbal Sahni Institute of Palaeobotany
  • University of St Andrews
  • University of Cape Town
  • Laurentian University
  • Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University
  • Chinese Academy of Geological Sciences
  • CAS - Nanjing Institute of Geology and Palaeontology

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

44 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The geological timescale before 720 Ma uses rounded absolute ages rather than specific events recorded in rocks to subdivide time. This has led increasingly to mismatches between subdivisions and the features for which they were named. Here we review the formal processes that led to the current timescale, outline rock-based concepts that could be used to subdivide pre-Cryogenian time and propose revisions. An appraisal of the Precambrian rock record confirms that purely chronostratigraphic subdivision would require only modest deviation from current chronometric boundaries, removal of which could be expedited by establishing event-based concepts and provisional, approximate ages for eon-, era-and period-level subdivisions. Our review leads to the following conclusions: (1) the current informal four-fold Archean subdivision should be simplified to a tripartite scheme, pending more detailed analysis, and (2) an improved rock-based Proterozoic Eon might comprise a Paleoproterozoic Era with three periods (early Paleoproterozoic or Skourian, Rhyacian, Orosirian), Mesoproterozoic Era with four periods (Statherian, Calymmian, Ectasian, Stenian) and a Neoproterozoic Era with four periods ( pre-Tonian or Kleisian, Tonian, Cryogenian and Ediacaran). These proposals stem from a wide community and could be used to guide future development of the pre-Cryogenian timescale by international bodies.

Original languageEnglish
Article numberjgs2020-222
JournalJournal of the Geological Society
Volume179
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 2022
Externally publishedYes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Geology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A template for an improved rock-based subdivision of the pre-Cryogenian timescale'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this