Abstract
The analysis of deindustrialisation has been led by heterodox economists, especially those in the structuralist and Kaldorian traditions, based on a conception of sectoral specificity and the role of manufacturing in growth. Sectors are not the units of Marxian economic analysis, but thinking through the meaning of sectors in Marxian terms allows for an analysis of the meaning and implications of a change in sectoral structure. Deindustrialisation is the sectoral shift that has been most prominent in recent decades and which is likely to have significant implications for the future of capitalism. This article develops an original Marxian theorisation of deindustrialisation. This conceptualisation includes a distinction between two forms of deindustrialisation. As well as taking into account changes in sectoral structure, the proposed typology considers whether such changes are associated with a shift between those activities that produce surplus value and those that do not or only a shift in the composition of surplus-value-producing activities. The distinction between different forms of deindustrialisation allows for an arguably richer analysis of this phenomenon than in more narrowly sector-based approaches.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 1373-1390 |
Number of pages | 18 |
Journal | Cambridge Journal of Economics |
Volume | 38 |
Issue number | 6 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 1 Nov 2014 |
Keywords
- Deindustrialisation
- Heterodox economics
- Manufacturing
- Marx
- Sectors
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Economics and Econometrics