A Longitudinal Test of the Job Demands-Resources Model among Australian University Academics

Carolyn M. Boyd, Arnold B. Bakker, Silvia Pignata, Anthony H. Winefield, Nicole Gillespie, Con Stough

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

174 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

A longitudinal test of the Job Demands-Resources (JD-R) model of work stress and engagement (Bakker & Demerouti, 2007; Demerouti et al., 2001) was conducted in a sample of Australian university academics (N= 296). The aim was to extend the JD-R model by (1) determining how well job demands (work pressure, academic workload) and job resources (procedural fairness, job autonomy) would predict psychological strain and organisational commitment over a three-year period, and (2) incorporating longitudinal tests of reversed causation. The results of SEM analyses showed that Time 1 resources directly predicted Time 2 strain and organisational commitment, but that Time 1 demands predicted Time 2 strain only indirectly via job resources. We did not find evidence for reversed causation. We discuss possible mediators of the relationships between working conditions and work stress outcomes, and the practical implications of the results.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)112-140
Number of pages29
JournalApplied Psychology
Volume60
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 2011
Externally publishedYes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Developmental and Educational Psychology
  • Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)
  • Applied Psychology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A Longitudinal Test of the Job Demands-Resources Model among Australian University Academics'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this