A discursive formation that undermined integration at a historically advantaged school in South Africa

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This paper provides an analysis of the extent ofintegration at a historically advantaged school. A qualitative multi-method case study allowed for in-depth analysis of integration in the school. Bernstein's theory of code, classification, boundary and power framed the study. Data analysis showed that: racial desegregation was achieved at student and level one staff level and lacking at management and administrative staff level; staffing integration was minimal; institutional culture integration was not evident; social boundaries enacted maintained previous race based power relations; weaker boundaries between instrumental and non-instrumental forms of knowledge legitimised students' experiences and interests but did not facilitate access to non-instrumental forms of knowledge and thinking; the dominant discursive frame of teachers was one of student deficit. These regularities point to a discursive formation (Foucault, 977) that undermine integration and would reproduce previous racialised inequalities. Finally, an explanation of the discursive formation is touched on followed by recommendations.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)19-30
Number of pages12
JournalPerspectives in Education
Volume28
Issue number2
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2010
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Boundaries
  • Code
  • Discourse
  • Discursive formation
  • Integration
  • Regularities

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Education

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A discursive formation that undermined integration at a historically advantaged school in South Africa'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this