TY - GEN
T1 - A Descriptive Review of Carbon Footprint
AU - Durojaye, Omoniyi
AU - Laseinde, Timothy
AU - Oluwafemi, Ifetayo
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020.
PY - 2020
Y1 - 2020
N2 - In the last couple of years, the expression ‘carbon footprint’ has been in use among meteorologist, especially in the United Kingdom. The usage of the expression is not unconnected with the fact that the challenge of climate change has been one of the topmost issues on political as well as corporate agenda. Therefore, calculations of carbon footprint have been in high demand. Scholars have proposed so many approaches to providing estimates. The methods runs from uncomplicated online calculations to other ones like complex life-cycle examination otherwise called input-output-based technique and tools. In spite of its ever-present use, it is clear that the term ‘carbon footprint’ does not have a generally acceptable academic definition. Thus, there is a dearth of clarifications of what ‘carbon footprint’ is in the scientific literature despite the fact that there are several studies or researches on energy as well as ecological economics which should have measured what precisely ‘carbon footprint’ is. Therefore, this particular paper is an attempt to explore the obvious inconsistency in the use of some terminology in both public and in the academic contexts. This has led to a suggestion of academic definitions based on generally accepted principles of accounting and modeling approaches. The paper treats questions of methodology like comprehensiveness, completeness, system boundaries, as well as units, also, the durability of most indicator.
AB - In the last couple of years, the expression ‘carbon footprint’ has been in use among meteorologist, especially in the United Kingdom. The usage of the expression is not unconnected with the fact that the challenge of climate change has been one of the topmost issues on political as well as corporate agenda. Therefore, calculations of carbon footprint have been in high demand. Scholars have proposed so many approaches to providing estimates. The methods runs from uncomplicated online calculations to other ones like complex life-cycle examination otherwise called input-output-based technique and tools. In spite of its ever-present use, it is clear that the term ‘carbon footprint’ does not have a generally acceptable academic definition. Thus, there is a dearth of clarifications of what ‘carbon footprint’ is in the scientific literature despite the fact that there are several studies or researches on energy as well as ecological economics which should have measured what precisely ‘carbon footprint’ is. Therefore, this particular paper is an attempt to explore the obvious inconsistency in the use of some terminology in both public and in the academic contexts. This has led to a suggestion of academic definitions based on generally accepted principles of accounting and modeling approaches. The paper treats questions of methodology like comprehensiveness, completeness, system boundaries, as well as units, also, the durability of most indicator.
KW - Direct carbon footprint
KW - Direct footprint
KW - Ecological Footprint
KW - Environmental accounting
KW - Indirect carbon emissions
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85071488344&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/978-3-030-27928-8_144
DO - 10.1007/978-3-030-27928-8_144
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:85071488344
SN - 9783030279271
T3 - Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing
SP - 960
EP - 968
BT - Human Systems Engineering and Design II - Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Human Systems Engineering and Design
A2 - Ahram, Tareq
A2 - Karwowski, Waldemar
A2 - Pickl, Stefan
A2 - Taiar, Redha
PB - Springer Verlag
T2 - 2nd International Conference on Human Systems Engineering and Design: Future Trends and Applications, IHSED 2019
Y2 - 16 September 2019 through 18 September 2019
ER -