TY - JOUR
T1 - A comparison of teacher’s involvement in curriculum development in developing and developed countries
T2 - a case study of Namibia
AU - Matiki, Des Ree Sabata
AU - Chibambo, Mackenzie Ishmael
AU - Divala, Joseph Jinja
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
Copyright © 2023 Matiki, Chibambol and Divala.
PY - 2023
Y1 - 2023
N2 - Curriculum development is an on-going process which involves different stakeholders such as teachers, parents, curriculum specialists, academic institutions and the general public. The involvement of all these stakeholders is essential for the success of any curriculum. This study sought to determine how teachers are involved in the curriculum development processes in Namibia. It did this by examining related literature from selected developing and developed countries on teacher involvement in the curriculum development processes. It further deployed a qualitative research approach which had a sample size of 11 secondary school teachers and six NIED officials who were interviewed. The empirical data alongside the reviewed literature, and the theoretical framework were thematically analysed. The findings revealed that secondary school teachers in Namibia did not meaningfully participate during the key stages of the curriculum development processes. These findings further affirmed the assumptions that teacher’s voices are mostly discounted during curriculum development processes despite the centrality of their roles and functions. The study further established that Namibia, like many African countries, use the top-down approaches when developing their curricula unlike developed countries such as Australia, Finland and Singapore.
AB - Curriculum development is an on-going process which involves different stakeholders such as teachers, parents, curriculum specialists, academic institutions and the general public. The involvement of all these stakeholders is essential for the success of any curriculum. This study sought to determine how teachers are involved in the curriculum development processes in Namibia. It did this by examining related literature from selected developing and developed countries on teacher involvement in the curriculum development processes. It further deployed a qualitative research approach which had a sample size of 11 secondary school teachers and six NIED officials who were interviewed. The empirical data alongside the reviewed literature, and the theoretical framework were thematically analysed. The findings revealed that secondary school teachers in Namibia did not meaningfully participate during the key stages of the curriculum development processes. These findings further affirmed the assumptions that teacher’s voices are mostly discounted during curriculum development processes despite the centrality of their roles and functions. The study further established that Namibia, like many African countries, use the top-down approaches when developing their curricula unlike developed countries such as Australia, Finland and Singapore.
KW - bottom-up approaches
KW - curriculum transformations
KW - equity
KW - intentions
KW - top-bottom approaches
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85173725508&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3389/feduc.2023.1243573
DO - 10.3389/feduc.2023.1243573
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85173725508
SN - 2504-284X
VL - 8
JO - Frontiers in Education
JF - Frontiers in Education
M1 - 1243573
ER -